I remember one moment during the debates, where McCain referenced Obama’s plans for High-speed rail, dismissing it as pork barrel spending and moving on to call everything else the same.
NOT pulling into a station near me...
Is it really Pork barrel spending? Possibly. There are so many hands dipping into every spending stream, especially military ones, that there is no doubt somebody that will skim a lot of this money into their own accounts, but that’s one of the reasons I voted the way I did. I’m hoping that OB really is trying to change that. Meanwhile, China is leaving us in the Stone age, spending $4 for every 1 that the US will spend, in the disputed budget proposal.
China has in its drive to become a world leader has committed to investing over $300 billion in high-speed rail through to 2020 in contrast to the much argued invest in the US of only $8 billion. – http://www.inquisitr.com/32532/chinas-high-speed-rail-to-leave-the-rest-of-the-world-behind/
Do we need Hi-speed rail? Yes. We need Low speed rail ffs. Locally, we are struggling to get train stations back to towns outside of general metro areas. There has been a train station in the DeKalb downtown area sitting vacant since before I was born. The sets of tracks that run along side it, straight trhough town, are constantly used for commercial freight, but it’s still unfeasible to set up commuter lines again? 60 miles outside of Chicago, you still have to drive 20 miles to get on a train that will go to Chicago’s Loop. From a town of 35,000. They are bringing out another train stop, hopefully, but in reality for people in my town, this changes nothing, even if I think it’s a good step. http://www.daily-chronicle.com/articles/2009/08/07/68259033/index.xml
The service is something worth having, no matter the trouble or cost. In the article about China’s hi-speed rail, they cite the heavy use of the system already as validation for it’s construction and upgrade, this is something that the US cannot cite because our own civilian train system stopped improving in the 50′s.
Related articles by Zemanta
- China’s High Speed Rail Will Leave U.S. in the Dust (treehugger.com)
- China’s high speed rail to leave the rest of the world behind (inquisitr.com)
- Moving Americans toward Train Transportation (scientificamerican.com)
- China’s amazing new bullet train (money.cnn.com)
- Our fast-train hangup (money.cnn.com)
- High-Speed Rail: Agreement Reached On Chicago-St. Louis Train Corridor (huffingtonpost.com)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8a0076bb-1a9a-4cf4-bdeb-6a68a69cdd92)
















![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=109fb5f0-0d51-4383-9020-6bf9033ae101)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=56e58133-97c7-4d30-b734-596e22148f3c)
In my post, Zack and Mary Made a Flop? I professed that possibly 
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=34f15538-c178-42af-b483-c1ed4c2aa0ef)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b3cb75fc-5ca9-4f54-b03f-e68c15392576)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=76f91c6d-a1e7-47de-9486-b54ee29332f2)
It’s Simple, Really, but Politics STILL Gives me Headaches
by meta4man on December 8, 2010
Oh, for the days when I did not pay attention to politics, and got swayed one way or another by the remotest and varied reasons. These days when someone sends me one of those hater political emails, I check it out, and have found that nobody appreciates when you point out their message was complete and utter bullshit.
I’m not a naysayer, I’m not a liberal, but these days, I might as well be, because I won’t listen to the likes of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh and take anything they say as truth. These guys lie, constantly, often when there is plenty to vent about that is true, it’s documented, with actual timelines and factual, video and photographic evidence.
Enough about that, I’m trying to understand why the democrat I and 60% of this country elected seems to always end up doing what the Republicans want. I’m also trying to understand how the SUPPOSED Party of Fiscal Responsibility – the Republicans, can look anyone in the eye and say this latest compromise bill, adding $900 BILLION to that deficit they regularly scream about, is something they support, no, DEMANDED.
I also don’t understand how a President whom I still support, but have now begun to question, can bring this to the people, bemoaning the latest citizens that the Republicans are holding hostage, the long term unemployed.
The Republicans have become high volume hostage takers, first it was those with underwater mortgages, who got small concessions to help them with the mortgages they probably shouldn’t have taken on anyway, at the expense of the big company bailouts.
Then it was those without health insurance, who got a watered down set of health care reforms and no real way to get the insurance they would now be required to have by the mandates the Republicans forced into the legislation, as they demanded the removal of the ‘Public Option’ under cries of Socialized Medicine’. For the record, it took less than a week after they got their way on dropping the public option before a conservative talking point came out asking how insurance can be mandated without some form of Public Option, despite these being documented as concessions they demanded.
This latest mess, the Bush Tax extensions, plus some extra gravy for the wealthy elite, smacks as too much concession to even be called compromise, the only thing I can see on this that the Republicans, still the minority party in both houses, is the extension of unemployment benefits, this is also the least costly of the latest compromise.
Otherwise, they have just added almost a Trillion dollars to the deficit they are already crying about. I’m insulted by the logic being fed to me on this issue. I’d prefer that everyone lose the Bush Tax cuts, which have been disastrous to our economy, before allowing the most wealthy to continue to get them. Yes, I would rather pay higher taxes, and the country’s bills, despite the unfairness of the tax burden on the middle class, me. The Bush Tax Cuts were passed by reconciliation, and should die by consensus. The rich should start paying at the tax rate that they were when this country was last prospering.
Well, I feel better now. Guess I’ll go and get my Senator’s address and write him a letter as well. He SAID he was an independent when he ran, I guess we’ll find out.